Segregation from the
general prison population is a severe and restricted form of confinement,
which the courts have held constitutes a separate and distinct form
of confinement that requires its own distinct legal justification. The
severity of segregation is recognized by Parliament in the CCRA,
which provides for segregation review boards to control against its
arbitrary imposition. The Arbour Commission found that the arbitrary
and illegal use of segregation was so prevalent at the Prison for Women
in Kingston that scrutiny by courts is necessary to properly regulate
extended periods of segregation. Federally sentenced women in B.C. are
subject to a lesser standard of protections with respect to the use
of segregation than are federally sentenced prisoners in penitentiaries
across the country because the procedural protections regulating the
use of segregation are not available to them under the agreement.
The ESA
provides that the federal and provincial governments may agree upon
what information can be released by the Director of Burnaby upon request
by a federally sentenced woman, and further what information will be
subject to the Privacy Act and Access to Information Act.
This derogates from the broader entitlement to information outlined
in s. 27 of the CCRA and circumvents the federal Access
to Information and Privacy Act by circumscribing the information
to which those Acts apply.
Currently, there is no provision in the agreement that refers to the Correctional Investigator, and
that Office does not involve itself in matters relating to federally sentenced women in B.C.
Section 167(2) of the CCRA excludes from the purview of the Correctional Investigator
Investigations into “any problem of an offender related to the offender’s confinement in a
provincial correctional facility, whether or not the confinement is pursuant to an [ESA]”. This
recognizes the constitutional limitations of a federal investigative body over provincial
authorities.
3. Disability
The CCRA
establishes a complete statutory framework which includes all aspects
of the confinement and release of prisoners serving federal sentences.
The overriding principle expressed in paragraph 4(a) of the CCRA is
the protection of society. The primacy of this concern reflects the
traditional security based model for prison management. Because of the
statutory mandate, CSC views virtually all decisions concerning imprisonment
through a security prism. Unfortunately, CSC interprets this requirement
to mean that security concerns prevail even over constitutional rights,
including equality rights.
Submission
of the Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies (CAEFS) to the
Canadian Human Rights Commission for the Special Report on the Discrimination
on the Basis of Sex, Race and Disability Faced by Federally Sentenced
Women
|