IV. International Obligations

Imprisonment may take away a prisoner’s freedom, but it does not nullify a prisoner’s right to equal treatment under the law, and it must never be allowed to sever the ties that link a prisoner to the brother and sisterhood the Universal Declaration of Human Rights accords us all.83

Canada’s international obligations are becoming increasingly important to the interpretation of both the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and our domestic laws. For FSW, this means that the CCRA, along with the regulations under it, must be scrutinized in light of Canada’s significant commitments to, for example, the elimination of discrimination against women, to fair treatment of prisoners, and to civil and political rights. Our discussion looks first at the increasing significance of international obligations to assessing the constitutionality and legality of domestic law and policy. We then set out a number of international instruments that have been identified as enshrining the rights of prisoners, and highlight some concrete ways in which Canada is in breach of those international obligations in its treatment of FSW.

On the importance of Canada’s international commitments to Charter interpretation, Chief Justice Dickson (as he then was) stated in Slaight Communications:

… Canada’s international human rights obligations should inform not only the interpretation of the content of rights guaranteed by the Charter… the fact that a value has the status of an international human right, either in customary international law or under a treaty to which Canada is a State Party, should generally be indicative of a high degree of importance attached to that objective.84

In Reference Re: Public Service Employee Relations, Chief Justice Dickson again underscored that:

The various sources of international human rights law – declaration, covenants, judicial and quasi-judicial decisions of international tribunals, customary norms – must, in my opinion, be relevant and persuasive sources for interpretation of Charter provisions.85


83.

M. Jackson, Justice Behind the Walls: Human Rights in Canadian Prisons (Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre, 2002) www.justicebehindthewalls.net/book.

84.

Slaight Communications Inc. v. Davidson, [1989] 1 S.C.R. at 1056.

85.

Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 313 at 348. These cases were positively referred to by the Supreme Court of Canada most recently in US v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283.


Previous Page Contents Next Page