In examining the court system in Manitoba, we are struck by the
fact that there clearly exists a distinguishable, separate justice system for
Aboriginal people. Indeed, the rhetoric that surrounds the equality of the
justice system evaporates as one examines the way the courts deal with
Aboriginal people. It is a system administered by non-Aboriginal people.
The laws which the courts apply are alien to Aboriginal people, the
adversarial approach employed by the courts dos not reflect Aboriginal
values, and the sanctions these courts apply are ineffective in terms of
deterring accused or others from further involvement.
The court system appears to view Aboriginal people and their
communities with a mixture of disdain and disregard. The province’s
senior courts never hold hearings in their communities, while the courts
that do travel there appear to want quite literally to “get out of town before
the sun goes down.” As a result, cases are either rushed through without
due preparation and consideration, or are delayed from month to month.
In short, the current court system is inefficient, insensitive and,
when compared to the service provided to non-Aboriginal people,
decidedly unequal (249).
Accepting that colonialism is the central experience which leads to the inequality of
Aboriginal peoples in the Canadian criminal justice system, of which over-representation
is but one example, permits the more specific examination of discrimination against
Aboriginal women in the Canadian correctional system.
Women in Prison: Historical Context:
It is racism, past in our memories and present in our surroundings that
negates non-native attempts to reconstruct our lives. Existing programs
cannot reach us, cannot surmount the barriers of mistrust that racism has
built. Physicians, psychiatrists and psychologists are typically White and
male. How can we be healed by those who symbolize the worst
experiences of our past? (Aboriginal Parolee) (CSC 1990: 10).
In order to understand the forms and extent of the discrimination Aboriginal
women who are federally sentenced experience, it is necessary to understand the
experiences of federally sentenced women as they define it. Aboriginal women’s
experience is both gendered and racialized. Often these two grounds of discrimination
cannot be distinguished16 in the examination of specific acts, policies or programs. Race (including colonialism) and gender are not discrete categories but overlapping and
independent experiences.
16. |
The courts have historically had difficulty dealing with these
questions of intersectionality. See for example, Canada (Attorney
General) v Lavell and Bedard, [1974] 1 S.C.R. 1349
(S.C.C.). For commentary and analysis see the discussion in Patricia
Monture-Angus, “Aboriginal Women and the Application of the Charter”
in Thunder in My Soul: A Mohawk Woman Speaks (Halifax:
Fernwood Publishing, 1995), 131-151 and “Seeking my Reflection:
Law and Constitutional Change” also in Thunder, 152-168. |
|