Actual identities of First Peoples are not reflected in common language despite the fact
that understanding how Aboriginal peoples understand themselves is essential to efforts
to ameliorate conditions which lead to imprisonment.
Returning to the statistics on over-representation, this point about the importance
of identity is made clear. Available only for the prairie region are some more specific
statistics about the Aboriginal population in federal prison. Of the 67 women serving a
federal sentence in May of 2000, 53 identified as “North American Indian” while 14
identified as Metis and 3 as Inuit (Borrowman 2000: 1). The over-representation of First
Nations women (that is “North American Indians”) is most pronounced in the prairies as
they accounted for 47.1% of the federally sentenced women population and 79.1% of the
Aboriginal offender population. Patterns of over-representation across Aboriginal people
indicate that at least in the Prairie Region, the incarceration rates of First Nations women
suggest that further study is essential so we understand why the representation is skewed
in this particular way. Additionally, ameliorative efforts should be directed specifically to
First Nation populations. AS the women are Cree, Saulteaux, Ojibwe and so on; it
emphasizes the need to think beyond general naming categories.
Acknowledging Colonialism:
A white settler
society is one established by Europeans on non- European soil. Its
origins lie the dispossession and near extermination of Indigenous
populations by conquering Europeans. As it evolves a white settler
society continues to be structured by a racial hierarchy. In the national
mythologies of such societies, it is believed that white people came
first and that it is they who principally developed the land; Aboriginal
peoples are presumed to be mostly dead or assimilated. European settlers
thus become the original inhabitants and the group most entitled
to the fruits of citizenship. A quintessential feature of white settler
mythologies is, therefore, the disavowal of conquest, genocide, slavery,
and the exploitation of the labour of peoples of colour. In North
America, it is still the case that European conquest and colonization
are often denied, largely through the fantasy that North America was
peacefully settled and not colonized.
Dr.
Sherene Razack, 2002 (1-2).
Over-representation
cannot just be understood as a peripheral tragedy, one in a continuing
experience Aboriginal people would describe as colonialism.8
The Commissioners of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry of Manitoba discussed
the complexities of colonial relationships and their impact on today:
Cultural oppression, social inequality, the loss of self-government
and systemic discrimination, which are the legacy of the Canadian
government’s treatment of Aboriginal people, are intertwined and
interdependent factors, and in very few cases is it possible to draw a
simple and direct correlation between any one of them and the events
which lead an individual Aboriginal person to commit a crime or to
become incarcerated. We believe that the overall weight of the evidence
makes it clear that these factors are crucial in explaining the reasons why
Aboriginal people are over-represented in Manitoba jails (86).
It is the legacy of colonialism that underlies the over-representation of Aboriginal peoples
in the Canadian criminal justice system. The dilemma, however, is that current Canadian
human rights regimes do not expressly acknowledge colonialism as a form of
discrimination.
The gendered specificity
of colonialism is an essential component to understanding the present
day situation of Aboriginal women in prison which one legal scholar
has called a “glaring sexual inequity” (Gibson 1990: 227). Kim Anderson
in her ground-breaking work, A Recognition of Being: Reconstructing
Native Womanhood, traces in detail the impact of colonial relations
on Aboriginal women (2000: 58, 62-65, 68-71, 75-78, 83-85, 91-94,97-98).9
Her concluding comments on the devastation colonialism has wrought demonstrates
the reason why understanding colonialism must be essential to understanding the discrimination Aboriginal women in prison experience.
Anderson explains:
8. |
For
a fuller discussion of the definition and impact of colonialism,
please see: Patricia Monture-Angus, Considering Colonialism and
Oppression: Aboriginal Women, Justice and the “Theory” of Decolonization”,
12:1 Native Studies Review, (1999), 63-94, Sherene H.
Razack, “Gendered Racial Violence and Spatialized Justice: The
Murder of Pamela George” in Razack, 121-156, and; Winona Stevenson,
“Colonialism and First Nations Women in Canada” in Dua 1999, 49-
80. |
9. |
See
also: Acoose, Janice, 1995. Iskwewak Kah’KiYaw Ni Wahkomakanak:
Neither Indian Princesses nor Easy Squaws (Toronto: Women’s
Press); Allen, Paul Gunn, 1983. The Scared Hoop: Recovering
the Feminine in American Indian Tradition (Boston: Beacon
Press); Carter, Sarah, 1997. Capturing Women: The Manipulation
of Cultural Imagery in Canada’s Prairie West (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s
University Press); Cook-Lynn, Elizabeth, 1996. Why I Can’t
Read Wallace Stagner and Other Essays (Madison: University
of Wisconsin Press) and in particular the article, “The Big Pipe
Case”; Razack, Sherene, 1998. Looking White People in the
Eye: Gender, Race and Culture in Courtrooms and Classrooms
(Toronto: University of Toronto Press); Solomon, Art 1994. Eating
Bitterness: A Vision Beyond Prison Walls (Toronto: NC Press);
and, Turpel, Mary Ellen, 1993. “Patriarchy and Paternalism: The
Legacy of the Canadian State for First Nations Women” in Canadian
Journal of Women and the Law 6, 174-192. |
|